Top    Guestbook    Funny    Links    Weasels    Me    News    Plumas Hotshots    Sportfaller    Stuff    Plants    E-Mail   


How to get booted from a e-mail list
Or
What's really going on at FedWorkersComp.net?


I am a member of several 'disabled' message boards- Wheelchair Junkie, The CareCure Community (SpineWire) and New Mobility. I'm also a member of Gardenweb, a (obviously) gardening message board- which is set up a little differently than the first 3, but is still very user friendly.
All of these have several thousand members, who help & support each other. It's very easy to pass information back & forth- I made a footplate to protect my feet. I put up a picture of it so everyone else could at least get the idea of how to make their own. Want to know the best place to get a mechanical reacher for cheap? Ask and within a day you'll have 5 to 10 replies. Want to just talk to someone for any reason at all? Pick one & send them a message via the internal message system on that particular message board. It's easy & safe, nobody's going to get any spam.. You can report Jackasses to the webmaster & have them removed.. Plus the format of the message board(s) themselves with questions & answers linked to one another and all placed in one spot makes it very easy to follow what's going on. The whole place is even searchable- So if someone wants to know how to make the "cloning box" I told everyone about four months ago the information can be in hand almost immediately. No asking the question again then sitting on hands for a day hoping it might get answered (again) this time.

On all these boards any information about any of the individual members is kept as secret as that particular member wants their personal info to be. It's easy to stay anonymous- Don't want someone to know something about you? Don't mention that information & nobody will ever know. Even better (if you wish) create an identity for yourself. If I wanted to I could be a ... (I don't know) Coal miner from Tennessee who was crushed by a falling support beam instead of a firefighter from California very easily. Nobody would know my entire identity was made-up.

So after fighting with OWCP for so long I began looking for a support group of 'injured Federal workers'. Figured with thousands of Federal jobs, no way could I be the first with a permanent injury. Someone had to have gone through this before me.

After a while of searching I came across a place called Fedworkerscomp.net. On the surface, it looked like a Great place- All kinds of information to be had.. A place where help might be found.

Eventually I found out that while they call themselves "FedWorkersComp", it's really a bunch of Postal workers. Who, yes, ARE federal workers, but they don't seem to realize there are Hundreds of other Federal jobs... I think part of the reason everyone thinks every other member is a fellow package handler is that the list owners make it virtually impossible to know anything about any particular person on the list. While on one hand that is a good policy for secrecy, when the idea is to pass information back & forth about helping each other, not knowing who you're talking to makes that a bit difficult.

Well... After looking around the place for a while, It looks like there's simply too much information. It's like when a new website creator builds a site about her cat Fluffy, and on one page has a link-list about all things relating to cats. Now instead of a few links to truly pertinent information this person adds thousands of links to anything that even mentions "cats". There is so much overload the search boggs down & becomes useless. That's what I found while looking for information relating to OWCP on this site.

But in the process of not finding anything usefull I figured out they had some sort of "mailing list" there where a person could write in, ask a question of the folks who'd "been there done that", and hopefully get a usefull answer. Figuring that was easier than sifting through thousands of pages of 'might be usefull' information I decided to sign up.

What a dance that was. At first, I tried to bounce it through this place- The way I have my email server set up I can make up anything(at)krstofer.org & it will bounce to my real email. So if I want to see if ebay is selling my email address, I just use ebay(at)krstofer,org there & I know immediately. Well I tried that- It didn't work. So I signed up with my "real" email. First time that didn't work either. Had a small conversation with the list owner about traces & that sort of thing (read about that stuff here) while I asked "please sign me up." which eventually happened.

So I start getting these emails once a day- They come in sort of a weird format, but I figured "it is what it is".. And as I read them I come to realize this group isn't really a group of blanket federal workers... 90% of them are Postal employees. Does that make a difference? Not really.. Unless you're Not one of Them, as I came to find out.

So whenever I join a group I like to read for a while, get to know the players- find out what's going on... Finding out what was going on was fairly easy- 75% complaining, (The Postmaster makes me drive 50 miles to work) 15% chaff & 10% usable question / answer.. BUt as for getting to know the players? Impossible. Seems that Barb (the owner) and Paul (the "moderator") feel that no private individual has the right to not be anonymous. Want to say anything about yourself? Not allowed. Want to post your personal site? Not allowed. Want to share your email with the group? That's about as bad as asking to boil & eat your neighbor's baby with these guys.

Somehing these people don't seem to realize is this: Any individual has the ability to control how much information they give out when they join an internet message board or email list or whatever. If all I want you to know is my name, then that's all you know. But if I want you to know my name, my injury, the state I am from,the names of my cats, the depth of my well and how big my bald spot is I have the choice of giving out that information. Unless of cource I belong to the FedWorkersComp list.. And then NO individual to individual information exchange is allowed- EVERYTHING must go through the moderator.

So time passes & I start to figure out what's going on... The email arrives. There are usually several conversational "threads" in each email. Should you want to comment on one, you hit "reply", change the subject line to reflect what part you're talking about, make your comments & send it. Sounds easy right? Well... Here's where it gets a little strange.
It arrives at Home Base and the Moderator goes through it stripping out all the 'personal identifying stuff' and anything he decides just Doesn't Belong. I have a signature block that goes on every outgoing piece of mail unless I uncheck the box, right? Well once I left it on & I got a refusal notice- "We don't allow personal information or links to personal sites" or something. (rolls eyes) Big deal, right? Often when I wrote in I felt like what I'd imagine a reporter for Pravda who had a slight "Western" slant to his stories must have felt.. "Gee I wonder how much of this is going to make it out the other side of the censors?"

But.. THis place was the ONLY place I'd been able to find where my questions might be answered.. Answers that must be taken with a grain of salt, mind you as because of the "privacy" concerns, I had no idea who was answering & their qualifications. For all I know, a monkey wrote the answer to my question and since it sounded plausible, I might take it as truth.

Anyway.. Time goes on & I'm trying to figure out how a "Schedule Award" works. Now somehow in that process I pissed off this guy Paul somehow- I asked a rather specific question- "Which Doctor makes the determiantion as to how disabled I am? Mine, or do I have to see one retained by OWCP?" (or something to that effect.) He answered "Go read CA_810" which is a document with some answers in it, but not the specific one I was looking for. So in my next email in I named him by name & mentioned that fact. Then later I asked another question about if they've paid for something once, can they be forced to pay for it again? I wondered because they've paid for fillings & cleaning my teeth- (7 of which were smashed in the accident, long time readers will remember) and I need a few more fillings & would like some cleanings. Paul replied something to the effect of "IF YOU ARE KNOWINGLY DOING SOMETHING ILLEGAL YOU BETTER STOP"... "Where the hell did that come from?" I wondered.. So I wrote back in "I am NOT knowingly doing something illegal, I just have questions. So I asked." INcidently, that answer of mine did not make it into the next 'mail to the group'. Gee wonder why huh.

So anyway.. After getting these things daily and reading them for a while I got to the point where if I wasn't expectiong an answer I would barely skim then delete the thing. I can only read so much pissing & moaning about how "The Postmaster made me do this or won't let me do that" before I get tired of it.. And this whole "helping eachother email thing" became like the odd washer you find while cleaning the garage. It might be usefull for something in the future.. But that chance of future use is probably not worth the time to pick it up now.

More time passes and I ask the occasional question, not really expecting much.. When one day I get this:

Today's Topics:

1. ***NOTICE FROM LISTOWNER*** (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)

--__--__--

Message: 1 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:52:16 -0700 To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] ***NOTICE FROM LISTOWNER*** Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

We have set up this list in order to protect all the injured and share= knowledge and support each other. That's why it's anonymous, and MESSAGES= ARE NOT TO BE POSTED OR FORWARDED ANYWHERE ELSE. That also includes anyone= (or business) cataloging messages for their own nefarious purposes. It has= come to my attention that things have occurred at various times by various= people and organizations. I am purposely being nebulous because I don't= want to reveal all I have come across or give anyone ideas. Suffice to= say, I WON'T TOLERATE THIS. Lots of people have worked very hard to= protect this list,and money (which is in short supply),has been spent to= make sure this is a safe zone. We don't even allow GMAIL addresses here= because they claim the right to all messages and their content. ANYONE FOUND TO BE VIOLATING THESE POLICIES WILL BE IMMEDIATELY= UNSUBSCRIBED AND BANNED PERMANENTLY. Thanks to everyone who has contributed and shared. Those who think they can= "get away with something" might do so, but they'll certainly get their= just rewards one way or another. Count on it! Thanks everybody for making this list a helpful and informative place. Take= care. Be well.

Barb
Knowledge is Power-Use It!

--__--__--

/////////////////////////////////**FEDWORKERSCOMP.NET FECALAND MAILING LIST**////////////////////////////////////////////////

FedWorkersComp.net (formerly FedupFeds) is an ALL VOLUNTEER, SELF-HELP and educational effort, as explained in our website at http://www.fedworkerscomp.net FEDWORKERSCOMP.NET is OWNED, RUN and MAINTAINED **SOLELY** by Paul and Barb as a labor of love and our contribution to ALL injured federal workers. We do not accept any contributions or charge for ANYTHING! ALL WE ASK IS TO DO ALL YOU CAN TO HELP ALL YOU CAN AND PASS IT FORWARD. Nobody is keeping score. This list is **PRIVATE**. DO NOT FORWARD any messages from this list to ANYONE or REPOST these messages anywhere else.This list is general information, NOT advertising, solicitation, legal or medical advice. All email addresses are PRIVATE and will NEVER be sold,rented, or revealed for ANY REASON. Please inform us of anyone trying to solicit you or asking for compensation for "representation" OR information OFF LIST. REMEMBER-You're the BEST of the BEST!! ~~Knowledge is Power-Use It!~~

///////////////////////////**FEDWORKERSCOMP.NET FECALAND MAILING LIST**//////////////////////////////////////////////////

** To POST a message, hit REPLY or send it to: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net ** To UNSUBSCRIBE or change your subscription between DAILY DIGEST, NO MAIL or INDIVIDUAL EMAILS go to the list page at : http://fedworkerscomp.net/mailman/listinfo/fedworkerscomp

SORRY-WE DO NOT HAVE YOUR PASSWORD, BUT YOU CAN GO TO THE LIST PAGE AND REQUEST IT AND MAKE THE NECESSARY CHANGES-WE CANNOT DO IT BECAUSE OF SECURITY REASONS........

** Questions??Comments.. please send OFF-LIST to: help@fedworkerscomp.net

End of Fedworkerscomp Digest

Now after reading this "notice" and thinking about it for a bit, I began to wonder... What are these people so afraid of? I've been reading this list for a couple months now and I haven't ever seen one thing that any Government, 'Homeland Security', OWCP, or any "person from the opposing side" might find interesting. I mean Jeez- "Don't forward this!" and "Don't store this!" They make it sound like some Top Secret transmission, when it's a free list supposedly ANYONE can sign up for. So if anyone's allowed to read it, why not forward it to your cousin Bob who broke his leg carryin' the mail? One answer. The owner & moderator of the list want to be in Control.
Think about it- If any of these Bad People want to read this email thing all they have to do is get a ambigious email address & sign up. I'm sure they have. Have this thing delivered to that address & then bounced somewhere where it can be stored.. It's very easy to set something like that up. It's prolly set up as I type right now.. Hence the vague references to "nefarious individuals" in the above WARNING email.

It's really quite comical when you think about it.

So after thinking about that warning thing for a bit.. I began to wonder what made these two individuals so nervous in the first place? What freaked them out? Why the paranoia? I've read the stuff they send out. It's not very exciting. Nobody's real name is used- Nobody's "real" email.. Total anonymous freak-out, Batman.
Not only did I wonder what caused the freakout, I'd rather not have whatever happened to these 2 happen to me, so I decided to write in & ask. Here's what I wrote:

On 12/22/2005 at 4:13 AM K rs wrote:

Ok, Newguy over here- After reading this notice, I've been wondering about a few things:

Why all the secrecy? This thing is about as anonymous as anonymous can get- And while on one hand that's a good thing, when we're trying to pass information back & forth, not knowing anything about any of the other participants seems like it could be a hinderance.

Example: Maybe there's someone out there in a manual wheelchair who keeps damaging their feet when they bang into things because they can't feel anything below their chest. (like me) I built my own footplate (and many other "adaptive" things to help myself out) but I'm not allowed to give out any personal info, so nobody knows. THis person keeps on banging their feet, one gets infected and eventually they loose that limb. Extreme case, but you get the point- And sad because I could have easily told them of my adaption or even built one for them. But they never knew.

Now I'm not saying that everyone should have to "tell all" about themselves, but honestly I don't care if everyone here knows all about me. I have nothing to hide. And if my knowledge past what little I know about OWCP can help someone then I'm all for it.

So- Why the iron curtain of secrecy? The list owners here have gone to great lengths to keep everything shrouded and I can't help but wonder from what or who? Honestly, when I think back on the information I've seen here in these past couple months I cannot remember anything that some "OWCP Type" might find interesting as in "We have to silence that voice, they know too much" or something like that. I just wonder what is the "terrible thing or group" here that we must protect ourselves from.

Why not have a "message board" type discussion? Where questions asked last week / month / year are still available to be searched? Would keep the repition of questions down, and the newguy who shows up tomorrow could get up to speed very quickly.
Once one of these emails has been sent, since there is no archive anywhere (with the apparent exception of the one kept by said "nefarious" individuals) the information is lost. No one from "out there" can search through all previous emails & get an answer to a question they might have.. Thus they must ask it again.
Seems like instead of moving forward helping each other sometimes we might be stuck chasing our tails.
Sure, with a "message board" type discussion there's a little less anonymity, but nobody would know anything personal past what the individual members choose to tell. I even set one up back a few years ago with the intent of helping others- BUt I apparently can't tell you about it. Curious tho- I just went & looked & there's a thread there directing folks to fedupfeds.org site.

"Just Curious" (I would use my own name and provide a link to my site where I wrote all about the injury, the recovery, and current lives I've changed when I go speak to various groups about it, but...)

I sent it into the 'regular' address.. Yes, had I read all the long winded "stuff" at the end of every transmission from these guys I *could* have sent it "off list".. But I didn't even thinl of doing that, since I know Paul reads and edits everything anyway.. So I knew he'd find it eventually. And really, maybe it would have been good for everyone on the list to hear the answer- Thus they could avoid whatever smack-down happened long ago.

Here's the reply I recieved:

Questions or comments about how the list works should be sent offlist to me or Barb our listowner. That's policy. Your complaints about this list will not appear on this list.

It's only personal identifying information we don't want on the open list, email addresses, names, phone numbers. We prevent email address harvesting for commercial and other spam, and for other questionable purposes. No one gets spam from being on our list; no one gets annoying offlist nonsense or harassment from being on our list. OWCP does not get the information to nail down who you are. Whether you care personally or not isn't the point; there are other people who do care, and you don't care what they want, obviously. There's no ban on discussing your personal situation as it relates to your claim or condition. Two "terrible things or groups" to keep your personal identifying information from is OWCP and your agency.

We don't keep archives because everyone's situation is different and what applies to one may be wrong for another. It's fine with us when people bring up questions that have been raised before. If it's too much trouble to ask, then it isn't important enough to ask. Really, it's a lot easier to just ask the question instead of searching through years of messages. We have about 800 people here and it would take months for you to do through an archive.

The reason you haven't seen anything some "OWCP type" might find interesting, is we prevent that.

You can run your own list any way you want.

paul, webmaster@fedworkerscomp.net

By his signature block, Paul is the Webmaster.. So I have him to thank for that huge link-list. He's also missing a few things I think.. "email address harvesting" is impossible on the "standard" message boards. OWCP can only get whatever anyone chooses to tell on those boards, and it would take "months" to search an archive if everything was in 'dead tree format' and the searching was done by hand. We have computers now. Months of searching is reduced to milliseconds with even the most geriactric personal computers.

Well, he didn't answer any of my questions and went right into defending himself, so I wrote back:

On 12/22/2005 at 7:21 AM K rs wrote:

Wasn't a complaint, Paul.
They were questions. WHich you still didn't answer.

Guess that freaked him out, as I quickly received a reply: This list is a free service. Who are you to make demands?

Now I guess I have a "thing" with talking down jumpers, so I couldn't stop myself..

On 12/22/2005 at 2:28 PM K rs wrote:

Paul- I didn't think you would answer- I'm just curious as to why all the paranoia. Not a "demand" or an "attack", just a question. No need to get all up tight and defensive. But... Sometimes "They" ARE watching you.. Especially when you make all kinds of noise about how you're *not* doing anything that needs watching, but in the same breath that you've got a secret.

But- Like you said, you get to run your site however you want. If you want to be the King of Censorship while "keeping everyone safe" that's fine. Just seems to stifle the flow of information at times, when I thought the 'sharing of inforamation & ideas' was the intent of the whole place. (and I bet it takes up a bit of your own time...)

Anyway- Try to relax a bit. Not everyone is out to get you or wants to get into a fight.

Krs

Took a few hours, but then I got this:

Odd, isn't it, that nobody else in seven years has whined about censorship, just because we don't allow email addresses to be seen by any nut case out there who happens to get on our list. Our 800 list members like the anonymity just fine. Our list policies have nothing to do with me personally or Barb, our listowner. We are retired and do not have an active claim, and we have nothing to gain by putting our time and money into it. If you imagine we have no enemies because of what we're accomplishing, think what you like. You've never run a list on this subject so you have no way of guessing what's needed to keep it on course. Others have tried and failed because they just didn't know what they were doing or lacked the experience and background to deal with the subject or people involved. Why do you make that ridiculous claim that hiding email addresses stifles the flow of information? How does that interfere with sharing information and ideas? Anyone with anything to ask or say about claim handling can put it on the list. What exactly is your problem with that? Not knowing anything about how to handle a list on federal injuries, you wouldn't know there are a lot of people out there in clinical depression and affected other ways by medications and pain, some on the verge of suicide now and then. We will NOT have other people writing them offlist (to their email addresses) giving them advice privately that they're afraid to put on the list instead. There's an enormous amount of misinformation and bad advice out there, and anything said to our list members had better be on the open list where all can see and comment. You are not going to contact our members privately and they're not going to contact you. I've answered your questions in spite of the personal slurs you seem to enjoy so much. You keep up the personal slurs and you will be unsubscribed permanently. Find someone else to nitpick who has time to waste on that crap. paul, webmaster@fedworkerscomp.net

So now I'm a whining nutcase.. Who is asking for the emails of the list members so I can.. What, talk them into jumping? And still he refuses to answer the question...

By now I'm pretty much over the whole thing.. I'd get better results talking to a wall.
The last thing I sent was this:

On 12/22/2005 at 9:25 PM K rs wrote:

Did I say ANYWHERE I wanted your email list?
Relax!
Sheesh!

It's really not as bad as you think. But if you think "all can see and comment" then you really haven't been paying attention.

Anyway...

Now so far I've been trading comments with Paul who must have forwarded who-knows-what to "Barb", the owner who sent me this:

You know, you really need to learn to play well with others. Sheesh is right. Apparently you know so little, and act like you know so much. Go play in the corner and bother somebody who'll put up with you. Maybe you're in a wheelchair for a reason and you need to learn a little something about compassion and understanding and selfless effort. Please don't bother us anymore with your garbage. You're going in the kill file. Get a life.Go find somewhere else to bitch to-you're not welcome here. Instead of captain peligro you should call yourself captain Mierta-much more fitting......

Barb
Knowledge is Power-Use It!

So now I no longer get an email a day full of sniveling postal workers worried that someone or something is going to get them.

So by now I'm sure everyone's curious to see what it's all about.. Ok. Here's an example of one transmission of this list thing:

Today's Topics:

<p>

   1. Denial of Surgery. (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)

   2. Performance of Duty (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)

   3. Denial of Surgery. (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)

   4. wrong social security number

(fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)

   5. Adaptive vehicle insurance:

(fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)

   6. postal/Withdrawal of (or Failure to Provide) Limited Duty

(fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)

   7. USPS Handbooks,Manuals and Publications*

(fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)

   8. Agency Tactics (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)

   9. Re: Performance of Duty (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)

 

--__--__--

 

Message: 1

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:40:18 -0700

To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net

Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Denial of Surgery.

Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

 

This is very nice information to have but one is not borne with 

information in ones head concerning the cheating government and the 

ways they screw up a claim.  I know how to handle OWCP now but it is 

good advice.  When i was injured this list did not exist nor did the 

internet. There was no help and people got their life destroyed.  Now 

there is at lease some help.  Its the system that is screwed-up and 

Congress should have stopped the injustice long time ago.

such is life and the screwing keeps going and people like Barb and 

Paul do what they can.

BG

 

 

 

--__--__--

 

Message: 2

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:41:16 -0700

To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net

Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Performance of Duty

Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

 

I know a person who has been in voc rehab for two

years now and is not terminated from his job yet. He

can go back to his job if he get doctor's release for

full duty. But he is not sure that he can lift

anything over 70 lb for 8 hrs shift. I wonder what

happens if  he dedices to go back to work full duty.

atCal

 

 

 

--- fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net wrote:

 

 

 

  What I have read is that Vocation Rehab comes into

  place after you have  been

  turned down a modified job and terminated from the

  PO. This is not  right?  I

  am awaiting to recieve my job offer but in the mean

  time a rehab  speciliat

  has already met and got my info and is going to set

  up an appointment  for a

  psychologist immediately.  I told her it was my

  understanding this  was not to

  be done unless the po wont accommodate and she said

  Shared Services  wanted

  thius done just in case and that way they wouldnt

  have to wait so long to  get me

  a private sector job.  Would any speak about this

  that has more  knowledge

  than I?  I just thought I didnt have to even meet

  her until I was  terminated.

  Didnt seem to be right making me go through all this

  if the po  is going to

  take be back, but I dont know how to handle it,  I

  can only  find a little info

  about the rehab program. Thanks for listening.

  KB

 

 

 

--__--__--

 

Message: 3

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:43:24 -0700

To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net

Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Denial of Surgery.

Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

 

Connie,

 

1. Not a question of work related even SOAF has it in. Lets stick to 

the next line only

 

2. Doctors that OWCP sent me to are not Hand Specialist but are 

General Orthopedic. My Doctor that is requesting surgery is a Hand 

Specialist Orthopedic.

            General Orthopedic do this procedure on a cadaver in Medical School. 

Hand Specialist Orthopedic do this procedure about once a week on 

patients.

 

QUESTION:

 

In matters of the hand does the weight of medical evidence, that 

being of a Hand Specialist Orthopedic Surgeon findings and 

EXPERIENCE, outweigh the findings of  General Orthopedic Surgeons who 

have no experience in removal of a sesemoid of the thumb?

 

Chilly in Philly

 

 

--__--__--

 

Message: 4

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:44:14 -0700

To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net

Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] wrong social security number

Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

 

 

I have a question about my benefits statement from OWCP.  I have

noticed

 that it has come with an unusual wrong number where my social

security

 number should be.  I called to ask about this from my claims examiner

and

 was given a supervisor, who told me they did not know anything about

it

 and that they would ask about it from somebody in Washington, D.C.,

and

 then they hung up on me.  Since then, I have been unable to find out

 anything about it.

  

  Has anybody on the list heard of anything like this before?  Do you

know

 who I should call or write to, to find out about it?  Thank you.

  

  JilliQ

 

 

 

--__--__--

 

Message: 5

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:45:11 -0700

To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net

Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Adaptive vehicle insurance:

Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

 

I heard a rumor that OWCP will pay the basic insurance

on a vehicle they have provided.

 

Is this true or not, and if so is there a form to fill

out or how would I get that started?

 

Thanks-

Krs

 

 

 

--__--__--

 

Message: 6

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:46:37 -0700

To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net

Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] postal/Withdrawal of (or Failure to Provide)

Limited Duty

Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

 

 

Thank you Sue05 for your knowledge of the rural carrier craft.  I

would

 like you to provide the  provisions.  April of 06 I will be with the

PO

 for six years.  I only found this site about six months ago.  I took

the

 advice of going to Dr. Ellis in OK. city.  Since ,  they have

everything

 on track for me.  BUT, my CE called to let me know they were assinging

a

 nurse to me but I haven't heard from them yet.  I am trying to

prepare

 myself to stay ahead of the game.  any advice would be greatly

 appreciated.

The  last two e-mails I have sent to fedworkers comp have ended up

mixed in

 with other peoples e-mails. The last was mixed with SNIP I think,

just

 wanted to let someone know.  I don't know if it was how I wrote it or

how

 this happened. Thank all of you for all the information and everyone

have

 a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.  JYR

 

fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net wrote:  To Barb:

I believe you are mistaking RCAs with TRCs. Temporary Rural Carriers

are

 limited term, non-bargaining unit rural carriers who have been hired

 without first passing the Rural Carrier Exam. Much like city casuals,

they

 are considered non-career emergency hires and do not enjoy many of

the

 benefits given to RCAs, such as bidding rights, union representation,

 leave, etc. This further establishes the pecking order for the craft.

RCAs

 (Rural Carrier Associates) are career employees more like city

carrier

 PTFs. As a matter of fact, several years ago, the USPS and the NRLCA

 negotiated a new position within the rural carrier craft called a

Part

 Time Flexible Rural Carrier. These positions are filled with current

 senior RCAs.

 

To JYR:

Although, contractually speaking, the rights of RCAs vary from those

of

 Regular Rural Carriers, the

USPS is absolutely just as obligated to RCAs as to other IOD rural

carrier

 employees. Do not let anyone with the Postal Service tell you

otherwise.

 Reference pertinent sections of the MOU at .7 and the National

Agreement

 at Article 7, Sec. B, & Article 21, Sec. 5. I would be happy to

provide

 the provisions if requested, as the union will probably not make them

 available to non-union employees.

 

Since, throughout my long career, I have found many persons in

authority

 throughout the USPS (Injury Comp and management as a whole) to be

almost

 completely ignorant of the rural carrier craft (city letter carriers

and

 rural carriers are similar positions with regard to basic work

 requirements, but hardly interchangeable- for example: the pay

situation

 for rural carriers is extremely convoluted) you would be well advised

to

 educate yourself using reliable sources. Mis-information can be more

 deadly than no information.

 

Sue05

 

 

--__--__--

 

Message: 7

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:23:11 -0700

To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net

Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] USPS Handbooks,Manuals and Publications*

Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

 

If it's not in the ASM anymore (it HAS been a few years,happily!)

here's

 all the other manuals. I'd appreciate anyone coming back and letting

us

 know. If not there other ones could be-Employee and Labor Relations

 Manual,Postal Operations Manual (POM),EL-312, Employment and

Placement

 ,EL-307, Reasonable Accommodation.......

 

Barb

Knowledge is Power-Use It!

 

 

 

 

http://www.nalc.org/depart/cau/pdf/manuals/asm13.1/asm/asmtoc.pdf

Administrative Support Manual (ASM), July 1999, Updated With Postal

 Bulletin Revisions Through July 10, 2003

 

http://www.nalc.org/depart/cau/manual.html

 

USPS Handbooks,Manuals and Publications*

           

           

            New USPS Handbook - EL-312

           

The Postal Service issued a new handbook, the EL-312, Employment and

 Placement, in September, 2001. The EL-312 replaces the EL-311, which

is

 now obsolete. Click to view online or download. 

 

NALC contract enforcers know that portions of USPS handbooks, manuals

and

 other regulations that "directly relate to wages, hours or working

 conditions" are effectively incorporated into the National Agreement

 through Article 19. NALC has obtained electronic versions of

important

 USPS manuals and handbooks directly from Postal Service headquarters.

In

 addition, the Postal Service has made certain publications available

 online. *See cautionary note concerning use of USPS publications.

 

Most of these materials are also available on the Contract Materials CD

Browse or Download:  

 

    * M-41, M-39 and Key USPS Handbooks

 

    * More USPS Handbooks

 

    * USPS Management Instructions

 

           

 

    * USPS Memorandum of Policy

 

 

    * USPS Publications

 

           

                       

USPS Handbooks and Manuals for Browsing or Downloading

These materials are in Adobe Acrobat AE format. In Windows AE, click

to

 browse online, right-click and save to download. Click and save to

 download Zip files. More Information

                         

                       

Description of USPS Publication          

Filename

           

Size

Key Handbooks and Manuals

Handbook M-41 - City Delivery Carriers Duties and Responsibilities,

March

 1998-Updated With Postal Bulletin Revisions Through April 5, 2001   

m41.pdf

           

1.6MB

Handbook M-39 - Management of Delivery Services, March 1998 - Updated

With

 Postal Bulletin Revisions Through March 18, 2004      

M-39.pdf

           

2.4MB

Handbook M-39 - Management of Delivery Services - Complete - Zip Format            

m39-3-04.zip

           

2.1MB

Employee and Labor Relations Manual - Issue 17.3, April 2003           

elmtoc.pdf

           

1.2MB

Employee and Labor Relations Manual - Issue 17.3, Complete - Zip Format    

elm17.3.zip

           

4.7MB

Administrative Support Manual (ASM), July 1999, Updated With Postal

 Bulletin Revisions Through July 10, 2003         

asmtoc.pdf

           

18K

Administrative Support Manual (ASM) - Zip Format    

asm.zip

           

2.7MB

Postal Operations Manual (POM) - Issue 9 - July 2002, Updated With

Postal

 Bulletin Revisions Through October 31, 2002  

pomtoc.pdf

           

521K

EL-312, Employment and Placement - September 2001 - Updated With

Postal

 Bulletin Revisions Through April 17, 2003       

el312.pdf

           

1.2MB

More USPS Handbooks

AS-353, Guide to Privacy and the Freedom of Information Act -

September

 2003  

AS-353.pdf

           

868K

AS-504, Space Requirements - July 1999 - Table of Contents

as504toc.pdf

           

201K

AS-504, Space Requirements - Zip Format     

as504.zip

           

2.9MB

DM-103, Official Mail - November 2001        

dm103.pdf

           

6.6MB

DM-901, Registered Mail - September 1997 - Updated With Postal

Bulletin

 Revisions Through August 10, 2000    

dm901.pdf

           

545K

EL-307, Reasonable Accommodation, an Interactive Process - September

2003   

el307.pdf

           

333K

EL-350, Establishing Nonbargaining Requirements - November 1989  

el350.pdf

           

498K

EL-502, CSRS Retirement Guide - July 1999  

el502.pdf

           

270K

EL-505, Injury Compensation - December 1995, Updated by Postal

Bulletin

 Revisions Through May 8, 1997         

505url.pdf

           

2.1MB

EL-505, Injury Compensation - Zip Format     

el505.zip

           

9.1MB

EL-603, Equal Employment Opportunity Complaint Processing - July 1996      

el603.pdf

           

580K

EL-801, Supervisor's Safety Handbook - May 2001   

el801.pdf

           

420K

EL-802, Executive's and Manager's Safety Compliance Guide - April 2002      

el802.pdf

           

734K

EL-809, Guidelines for Area/Local Joint Labor-Management Safety and

Health

 Committees - April 2001        

el809.pdf

           

46K

EL-809T, Area/Local Joint Labor-Management Safety and Health Committee

 Training - April 2001  

el809t.pdf

           

127K

EL-812, Hazardous Materials and Spill Response - May 1998

el812.pdf

           

1.3MB

EL-814, Employee's Guide to Safety - March 2001     

el814.pdf

           

161K

F-1, Post Office Accounting Procedures - November 1996, Updated by

Postal

 Bulletin Revisions through September 4, 2003

f1toc.pdf

           

306K

F-1, Post Office Accounting Procedures - Zip Format  

f1.zip

           

4.7MB

F-15, Travel and Relocation - August 1997 - Updated With Postal

Bulletin

 Revisions Through January 9, 2003     

f15.pdf

           

953K

F-21, Time and Attendance - June 2002          

f21toc.pdf

           

311K

F-21, Time and Attendance - June 2002 - Zip Format

F-21.zip

           

24.2MB

F-401, Supervisor's Guide to Scheduling and Premium Pay - August 2000       

f401.pdf

           

334K

M-32, Management Operating Data System (MODS) - April 2000     

m32.pdf

           

1.2MB

P-5, Highway Contract Routes - Box Delivery Service - July 2001       

p5.pdf

           

195K

PO-610, Signature Capture and Electronic Record Management: Manager's

Guide

 to Standard Operating Procedures - July 2000            

po610.pdf

           

718K

PO-701, Fleet Management - March 1991- Updated With Postal Bulletin

 Revisions Through September 21, 2000          

po701.pdf

           

3.8MB

USPS Management Instructions

MI AS-310-96-3, Management of Policy and Procedure Information - Paper

and

 On-Line - May 1, 1996          

MI AS-310-96-3.pdf

           

144K

MI EL-430-90-8, Back Pay - July 2, 1990     

MI EL-430-90-8.pdf

           

126K

MI EL-510-1999-4, Annual Leave Sharing Program - October 27, 1999        

MI EL-510-1999-4.pdf

           

50K

MI EL-520-91-2, FEHB: Temporary Continuation of Coverage - March 27,

1991   

MI EL-520-91-2.pdf

           

132K

MI EL-540-91-1, Job-Related First Aid Injuries - January 25, 1991    

MI EL-540-91-1.pdf

           

37K

MI EL-810-96-1, Response to Hazardous Materials Releases - February 1,

1996

           

MI EL-810-96-1.pdf

           

70K

MI EL-810-96-2, Hazard Communication Programs - Feburary 2, 1996         

MI EL-810-96-2.pdf

           

70K

MI EL-860-98-2, Employee Medical Records - May 15, 1998           

MI EL-860-98-2.pdf

           

86K

MI EL-860-1999-3, Emergency Response to Mail Allegedly Containing

Anthrax -

 October 4, 1999        

MI EL-860-1999-3.pdf

           

26K

MI EL-860-2000-7, Fitness for Duty Examinations - September 28, 2000       

MI EL-860-2000-7.pdf

           

132K

MI FM-640-2002-1, Government-Issued, Individually Billed Travel Charge

 Cards - March 4, 2002          

MI FM-640-2002-1.pdf

           

32K

MI PO-720-95-2, Alcohol and Drug Testing of Employees With a

Commercial

 Driver's License - September 29, 1995           

MI PO-720-95-2.pdf

           

82K

USPS Memorandum of Policy

COO-10-25-2001, Collection of Employee Data - October 25, 2001

COO-10-25-2001.pdf

           

16K

USPS Publications

PUB 18, Manager's Guide to Understanding Affirmative Action - June 1996    

pub18.pdf

           

255K

PUB 32, Glossary of Postal Terms - May 1997 - Updated With Postal

Bulletin

 Revisions Through November 4, 1999            

pub32.pdf

           

556K

PUB 45, A Violence-Free Workplace - November 1998        

pub45.pdf

           

65K

PUB 60, A Great Place to Work - February 1999       

pub60.pdf

           

295K

PUB 60-B, A Great Place to Work for City Carriers - October 1999  

pub60b.pdf

           

305K

PUB 71, Notice for Employees Requesting FMLA Leave - February 2001      

pub71.pdf

           

24K

PUB 107, Crisis Management for Violent Incidents - May 1997           

pub107.pdf

           

118K

PUB 108, Threat Assessment Team Guide - May 1997           

pub108.pdf

           

163K

PUB 164, Compensation, Relocation Benefits, and Reinstatement Policies

for

 Career Employees - January 2003      

pub164.pdf

           

135K

PUB 223, Directives and Forms Catalog - June 1999, Updated With Postal

 Bulletin Revisions Through September 18, 2003          

pub223-2003.pdf

           

1.5MB

PUB-317, Manager's Guide to Reasonable Accommodation - July 2002          

pub317.pdf

           

346K

PUB 518, EAP Supervisor's Guide - December 1993  

pub518.pdf

           

486K

PUB 519, Employee Assistance Program - October 1993       

pub519.pdf

           

321K

PUB 542, Understanding The Private Express Statutes - June 1998     

pub542.pdf

           

147K

PUB 552, Manager 92s Guide to Understanding Sexual Harassment -

September

 2001  

pub552.pdf

           

421K

PUB 553, Employee 92s Guide to Understanding Sexual Harassment -

September

 2001  

pub553.pdf

           

422K

June 1997

 

Three Cautions on the Use of USPS Publications

1. Check for the latest issue. The Postal Service updates its various

 manuals and handbooks according to different schedules. (For instance,

the

 ELM has been revised several times during the past couple of years.)

To

 see if you have the current edition of a particular publication,

obtain

 the latest Publication 223, Directives and Forms Catalog, from the

USPS

 Web site, http://www.usps.com. Use the site 92s search function to

locate

 a publication.

 

2. Some provisions may be under NALC challenge. Any of the USPS

handbooks,

 manuals or publications provided on this site or available on the Web

may

 be under an NALC challenge in the grievance procedure. NALC 92s

 distribution of or links to these materials is not in any way an

admission

 that they are contractually sound or otherwise free from challenge.

Check

 with your NALC branch officers or national business agent about the

 validity of a particular publication or provision.

 

3. Some items may not be covered by Article 19. Some handbook and

manual

 provisions 97for example, much of the M-39, M-41 and ELM 97are

 enforce-able as part of the contract under Article 19. However,

certain

 other USPS publications may not be covered by Article 19.

 

USPS Publications Available Online

The Employee and Labor Relations Manual (ELM), the Domestic Mail

Manual

 (DMM), International Mail Manual (IMM), Publication 223, Directives

and

 Forms Catalog, and issues of the Postal Bulletin are all available

online

 at the Postal Service's Web site, http://www.usps.com. Use the site's

 search engine to find these publications.

 

 

--__--__--

 

Message: 8

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:01:59 -0700

To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net

Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Agency Tactics

Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

 

 

I am wondering if anyone else has experienced the same.  This year as

has

 been true for the past 4 years, my Christmas greetings from the post

 office came in the form of a certified letter.  I am not sure what it

 contains as the letter carrier did not even bother to knock the door,

he

 just left the notice in my mailbox.  Maybe, he is aware of the

contents

 and did not want to be a willing party to this.  In the past, the

contents

 have been "option letters" threatening removal.  Who knows, this year,

it

 may even be the removal that they have been "promising." Hope no one

else

 got this type of greeting.  I wonder why agencies feel that they have

to

 resort to psychological warfare when the cards are all stacked in

their

 favor anyway.  Thanks for letting me get this off my chest.

 

dps

 

 

 

 

--__--__--

 

Message: 9

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:14:56 -0700

To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net

Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Re: Performance of Duty

Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net

 

 

Rehab has nothing to do with turning down a modified job or any other

job,

 nor is it automatic under certain circumstances. The program is

described

 in the CA-810 and other sources.  The way I read it, it's not

triggered so

 long as the claimant is still carried as an employee where injured.

 

You're notified of your obligations under the OWCP rehab program by a

 formal letter from OWCP. If you are not so notified by letter from

OWCP,

 then any other so-called Rehab is not required by OWCP and you are

under

 no obligation whatever to pay any attention to it.  It sounds to me

like

 you're being set up for total disaster. If that's the case I suggest

you

 go to the psychologist appointment and tell him to shove it.

 

paul, webmaster@fedworkerscomp.net

 

 

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

 

On 12/21/2005 at 8:41 PM WebmasterFWC wrote:

 

 I know a person who has been in voc rehab for two

 years now and is not terminated from his job yet. He

 can go back to his job if he get doctor's release for

 full duty. But he is not sure that he can lift

 anything over 70 lb for 8 hrs shift. I wonder what

 happens if  he dedices to go back to work full duty.

 atCal

 

 

 

 --- fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net wrote:

 

  

  

   What I have read is that Vocation Rehab comes into

   place after you have  been

   turned down a modified job and terminated from the

   PO. This is not  right?  I

   am awaiting to recieve my job offer but in the mean

   time a rehab  speciliat

   has already met and got my info and is going to set

   up an appointment  for a

   psychologist immediately.  I told her it was my

   understanding this  was not to

   be done unless the po wont accommodate and she said

   Shared Services  wanted

   thius done just in case and that way they wouldnt

   have to wait so long to  get me

   a private sector job.  Would any speak about this

   that has more  knowledge

   than I?  I just thought I didnt have to even meet

   her until I was  terminated.

   Didnt seem to be right making me go through all this

   if the po  is going to

   take be back, but I dont know how to handle it,  I

   can only  find a little info

   about the rehab program. Thanks for listening.

   KB

See? Pretty exciting huh? Yup.. Better hide that Quick before any Big Brother types catch sight of it..
It even contained a question of mine.. But see how much Crap had to be shoveled just for that? So not worth it.. Almost need a search function on the email itself to find what you're looking for. In fact, I've used 'CTRL-F' to get to what I wanted to read several times. So no wonder Paul isn't interested in building an archive. Can you imagine the mess that would be if the information was left in this format?

The thing I find really strange about it is you only get 1 part of the conversation per email. So unless you happen to remember what was in yesterday's mail, that is IF there was a part of it there yesterday.. Could be the day before, or the day before that.... Often it's hard if not impossible to figure out what's going on.

More evidence of paranoia- When I did a Whois search on fedworkerscomp.org I hit the wall newly implimented (in the last year or 2) by InterNic where with a few extra $$ a person can hide the regristration information for a domain name. So I went back in time a bit & looked up 'fedupfeds.org' their former domain name.. Here's what I found:

Domain ID:D88098465-LROR
Domain Name:FEDUPFEDS.ORG
Created On:03-Jul-2002 17:38:10 UTC
Last Updated On:12-Aug-2005 17:40:57 UTC
Expiration Date:03-Jul-2006 17:43:38 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Moniker Online Services Inc. (R145-LROR)
Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:MONIKER23658
Registrant Name:Role
Registrant Organization:Moniker Privacy Services
Registrant Street1:20 SW 27 Ave
Registrant Street2:Suite 201
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Pompano Beach
Registrant State/Province:FL
Registrant Postal Code:33069
Interesting huh? "Moniker Privacy Services" registered the domain name for them. So... The question STILL remains even after ALL this.. What are these people afraid of?

Maybe there just isn't an answer.. If you ask the guy in the basement bunker in Montana why he has an armory full of guns & 500 years of MRE's he'll tell you "The Government is out to Get Me."
Seems like the same thing is going on with this crowd. Not only do they really seem to enjoy keeping secrets and "protecting" their flock.. They seem to enjoy the power of censorship over that flock just as much. They claim to have "800 members".. I wonder how many of these "800 members" (quite a following for being around seven years huh?) are still active? I bet only 10 to 20%.

I'm sure in the beginning the intent was to actually help one another.. But now.. I'm not really sure what's going on. I know it's not worth my time to try & ferret out an answer here.. Better to just call the OWCP office & ask. So getting banned was probably a good thing.. Now I don't waste time reading it out of morbid curiosity, and I don't have to go through the dance of trying to remove myself from the list. Should I ever want to join again (Why I would I haven't the faintest, but..) all I have to do is get an email addy somewhere & sign up. Very easy. Sign my questions "Bob" and nobody's the wiser. And even if "They" have my IP squirreled away somewhere it's not like that's difficult to mask...

Anyone remember what's said about "Absolute Power"? A perfect example can be found right here. "We're not about getting mad or getting even... " They say.