On all these boards any information about any of the individual members is kept as secret as that particular member wants their personal info to be. It's easy to stay anonymous- Don't want someone to know something about you? Don't mention that information & nobody will ever know. Even better (if you wish) create an identity for yourself. If I wanted to I could be a ... (I don't know) Coal miner from Tennessee who was crushed by a falling support beam instead of a firefighter from California very easily. Nobody would know my entire identity was made-up.
So after fighting with OWCP for so long I began looking for a support group of 'injured Federal workers'. Figured with thousands of Federal jobs, no way could I be the first with a permanent injury. Someone had to have gone through this before me.
After a while of searching I came across a place called Fedworkerscomp.net. On the surface, it looked like a Great place- All kinds of information to be had.. A place where help might be found.
Eventually I found out that while they call themselves "FedWorkersComp", it's really a bunch of Postal workers. Who, yes, ARE federal workers, but they don't seem to realize there are Hundreds of other Federal jobs... I think part of the reason everyone thinks every other member is a fellow package handler is that the list owners make it virtually impossible to know anything about any particular person on the list. While on one hand that is a good policy for secrecy, when the idea is to pass information back & forth about helping each other, not knowing who you're talking to makes that a bit difficult.
Well... After looking around the place for a while, It looks like there's simply too much information. It's like when a new website creator builds a site about her cat Fluffy, and on one page has a link-list about all things relating to cats. Now instead of a few links to truly pertinent information this person adds thousands of links to anything that even mentions "cats". There is so much overload the search boggs down & becomes useless. That's what I found while looking for information relating to OWCP on this site.
But in the process of not finding anything usefull I figured out they had some sort of "mailing list" there where a person could write in, ask a question of the folks who'd "been there done that", and hopefully get a usefull answer. Figuring that was easier than sifting through thousands of pages of 'might be usefull' information I decided to sign up.
What a dance that was. At first, I tried to bounce it through this place- The way I have my email server set up I can make up anything(at)krstofer.org & it will bounce to my real email. So if I want to see if ebay is selling my email address, I just use ebay(at)krstofer,org there & I know immediately. Well I tried that- It didn't work. So I signed up with my "real" email. First time that didn't work either. Had a small conversation with the list owner about traces & that sort of thing (read about that stuff here) while I asked "please sign me up." which eventually happened.
So I start getting these emails once a day- They come in sort of a weird format, but I figured "it is what it is".. And as I read them I come to realize this group isn't really a group of blanket federal workers... 90% of them are Postal employees. Does that make a difference? Not really.. Unless you're Not one of Them, as I came to find out.
So whenever I join a group I like to read for a while, get to know the players- find out what's going on... Finding out what was going on was fairly easy- 75% complaining, (The Postmaster makes me drive 50 miles to work) 15% chaff & 10% usable question / answer.. BUt as for getting to know the players? Impossible. Seems that Barb (the owner) and Paul (the "moderator") feel that no private individual has the right to not be anonymous. Want to say anything about yourself? Not allowed. Want to post your personal site? Not allowed. Want to share your email with the group? That's about as bad as asking to boil & eat your neighbor's baby with these guys.
Somehing these people don't seem to realize is this: Any individual has the ability to control how much information they give out when they join an internet message board or email list or whatever. If all I want you to know is my name, then that's all you know. But if I want you to know my name, my injury, the state I am from,the names of my cats, the depth of my well and how big my bald spot is I have the choice of giving out that information. Unless of cource I belong to the FedWorkersComp list.. And then NO individual to individual information exchange is allowed- EVERYTHING must go through the moderator.
So time passes & I start to figure out what's going on... The email arrives. There are usually several conversational "threads" in each email. Should you want to comment on one, you hit "reply", change the subject line to reflect what part you're talking about, make your comments & send it. Sounds easy right? Well... Here's where it gets a little strange.
It arrives at Home Base and the Moderator goes through it stripping out all the 'personal identifying stuff' and anything he decides just Doesn't Belong. I have a signature block that goes on every outgoing piece of mail unless I uncheck the box, right? Well once I left it on & I got a refusal notice- "We don't allow personal information or links to personal sites" or something. (rolls eyes) Big deal, right? Often when I wrote in I felt like what I'd imagine a reporter for Pravda who had a slight "Western" slant to his stories must have felt.. "Gee I wonder how much of this is going to make it out the other side of the censors?"
But.. THis place was the ONLY place I'd been able to find where my questions might be answered.. Answers that must be taken with a grain of salt, mind you as because of the "privacy" concerns, I had no idea who was answering & their qualifications. For all I know, a monkey wrote the answer to my question and since it sounded plausible, I might take it as truth.
Anyway.. Time goes on & I'm trying to figure out how a "Schedule Award" works. Now somehow in that process I pissed off this guy Paul somehow- I asked a rather specific question- "Which Doctor makes the determiantion as to how disabled I am? Mine, or do I have to see one retained by OWCP?" (or something to that effect.) He answered "Go read CA_810" which is a document with some answers in it, but not the specific one I was looking for. So in my next email in I named him by name & mentioned that fact. Then later I asked another question about if they've paid for something once, can they be forced to pay for it again? I wondered because they've paid for fillings & cleaning my teeth- (7 of which were smashed in the accident, long time readers will remember) and I need a few more fillings & would like some cleanings. Paul replied something to the effect of "IF YOU ARE KNOWINGLY DOING SOMETHING ILLEGAL YOU BETTER STOP"... "Where the hell did that come from?" I wondered.. So I wrote back in "I am NOT knowingly doing something illegal, I just have questions. So I asked." INcidently, that answer of mine did not make it into the next 'mail to the group'. Gee wonder why huh.
So anyway.. After getting these things daily and reading them for a while I got to the point where if I wasn't expectiong an answer I would barely skim then delete the thing. I can only read so much pissing & moaning about how "The Postmaster made me do this or won't let me do that" before I get tired of it.. And this whole "helping eachother email thing" became like the odd washer you find while cleaning the garage. It might be usefull for something in the future.. But that chance of future use is probably not worth the time to pick it up now.
More time passes and I ask the occasional question, not really expecting much.. When one day I get this:
Today's Topics:
1. ***NOTICE FROM LISTOWNER***
(fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:52:16 -0700
To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net
From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net
Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] ***NOTICE FROM LISTOWNER***
Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net
We have set up this list in order to protect all the injured and share=
knowledge and support each other. That's why it's anonymous, and
MESSAGES=
ARE NOT TO BE POSTED OR FORWARDED ANYWHERE ELSE. That also includes
anyone=
(or business) cataloging messages for their own nefarious purposes. It
has=
come to my attention that things have occurred at various times by
various=
people and organizations. I am purposely being nebulous because I
don't=
want to reveal all I have come across or give anyone ideas. Suffice
to=
say, I WON'T TOLERATE THIS. Lots of people have worked very hard to=
protect this list,and money (which is in short supply),has been spent
to=
make sure this is a safe zone. We don't even allow GMAIL addresses
here=
because they claim the right to all messages and their content.
ANYONE FOUND TO BE VIOLATING THESE POLICIES WILL BE IMMEDIATELY=
UNSUBSCRIBED AND BANNED PERMANENTLY.
Thanks to everyone who has contributed and shared. Those who think they
can=
"get away with something" might do so, but they'll certainly get
their=
just rewards one way or another. Count on it!
Thanks everybody for making this list a helpful and informative place.
Take=
care. Be well.
Barb
--__--__--
/////////////////////////////////**FEDWORKERSCOMP.NET FECALAND MAILING
LIST**////////////////////////////////////////////////
FedWorkersComp.net (formerly FedupFeds) is an ALL VOLUNTEER, SELF-HELP
and educational effort, as explained in our website at
http://www.fedworkerscomp.net FEDWORKERSCOMP.NET is OWNED, RUN and
MAINTAINED **SOLELY** by Paul and Barb as a labor of love and our
contribution to ALL injured federal workers. We do not accept any contributions
or charge for ANYTHING! ALL WE ASK IS TO DO ALL YOU CAN TO HELP ALL YOU
CAN AND PASS IT FORWARD. Nobody is keeping score.
This list is **PRIVATE**. DO NOT FORWARD any messages from this list to
ANYONE or REPOST these messages anywhere else.This list is general
information, NOT advertising, solicitation, legal or medical advice.
All email addresses are PRIVATE and will NEVER be sold,rented, or
revealed for ANY REASON. Please inform us of anyone trying to solicit you or
asking for compensation for "representation" OR information OFF LIST.
REMEMBER-You're the BEST of the BEST!! ~~Knowledge is Power-Use It!~~
///////////////////////////**FEDWORKERSCOMP.NET FECALAND MAILING
LIST**//////////////////////////////////////////////////
** To POST a message, hit REPLY or send it to:
fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net
** To UNSUBSCRIBE or change your subscription between DAILY DIGEST, NO
MAIL or INDIVIDUAL EMAILS go to the list page at :
http://fedworkerscomp.net/mailman/listinfo/fedworkerscomp
SORRY-WE DO NOT HAVE YOUR PASSWORD, BUT YOU CAN GO TO THE LIST PAGE AND
REQUEST IT AND MAKE THE NECESSARY CHANGES-WE CANNOT DO IT BECAUSE OF
SECURITY REASONS........
** Questions??Comments.. please send OFF-LIST to:
help@fedworkerscomp.net
End of Fedworkerscomp Digest
Knowledge is Power-Use It!
Now after reading this "notice" and thinking about it for a bit, I began to wonder... What are these people so afraid of? I've been reading this list for a couple months now and I haven't ever seen one thing that any Government, 'Homeland Security', OWCP, or any "person from the opposing side" might find interesting. I mean Jeez- "Don't forward this!" and "Don't store this!" They make it sound like some Top Secret transmission, when it's a free list supposedly ANYONE can sign up for. So if anyone's allowed to read it, why not forward it to your cousin Bob who broke his leg carryin' the mail? One answer. The owner & moderator of the list want to be in Control.
Think about it- If any of these Bad People want to read this email thing all they have to do is get a ambigious email address & sign up. I'm sure they have. Have this thing delivered to that address & then bounced somewhere where it can be stored.. It's very easy to set something like that up. It's prolly set up as I type right now.. Hence the vague references to "nefarious individuals" in the above WARNING email.
It's really quite comical when you think about it.
So after thinking about that warning thing for a bit.. I began to wonder what made these two individuals so nervous in the first place? What freaked them out? Why the paranoia? I've read the stuff they send out. It's not very exciting. Nobody's real name is used- Nobody's "real" email.. Total anonymous freak-out, Batman.
Not only did I wonder what caused the freakout, I'd rather not have whatever happened to these 2 happen to me, so I decided to write in & ask. Here's what I wrote:
On 12/22/2005 at 4:13 AM K rs wrote:
Why all the secrecy? This thing is about as anonymous
as anonymous can get- And while on one hand that's a
good thing, when we're trying to pass information back
& forth, not knowing anything about any of the other
participants seems like it could be a hinderance.
Example: Maybe there's someone out there in a manual
wheelchair who keeps damaging their feet when they
bang into things because they can't feel anything
below their chest. (like me) I built my own footplate
(and many other "adaptive" things to help myself out)
but I'm not allowed to give out any personal info, so
nobody knows. THis person keeps on banging their feet,
one gets infected and eventually they loose that limb.
Extreme case, but you get the point- And sad because I
could have easily told them of my adaption or even
built one for them. But they never knew.
Now I'm not saying that everyone should have to "tell
all" about themselves, but honestly I don't care if
everyone here knows all about me. I have nothing to
hide. And if my knowledge past what little I know
about OWCP can help someone then I'm all for it.
So- Why the iron curtain of secrecy? The list owners
here have gone to great lengths to keep everything
shrouded and I can't help but wonder from what or who?
Honestly, when I think back on the information I've
seen here in these past couple months I cannot
remember anything that some "OWCP Type" might find
interesting as in "We have to silence that voice, they
know too much" or something like that. I just wonder
what is the "terrible thing or group" here that we
must protect ourselves from.
Why not have a "message board" type discussion? Where
questions asked last week / month / year are still
available to be searched? Would keep the repition of
questions down, and the newguy who shows up tomorrow
could get up to speed very quickly.
"Just Curious"
(I would use my own name and provide a link to my site
where I wrote all about the injury, the recovery, and
current lives I've changed when I go speak to various
groups about it, but...)
Once one of these emails has been sent, since
there is no archive anywhere (with the apparent
exception of the one kept by said "nefarious"
individuals) the information is lost. No one from "out
there" can search through all previous emails & get an
answer to a question they might have.. Thus they must
ask it again.
Seems like instead of moving forward helping each
other sometimes we might be stuck chasing our tails.
Sure, with a "message board" type discussion
there's a little less anonymity, but nobody would know
anything personal past what the individual members
choose to tell. I even set one up back a few years ago
with the intent of helping others- BUt I apparently
can't tell you about it. Curious tho- I just went &
looked & there's a thread there directing folks to
fedupfeds.org site.
Here's the reply I recieved:
Questions or comments about how the list works should be sent offlist
to me or Barb our listowner. That's policy. Your complaints about this
list will not appear on this list.
It's only personal identifying information we don't want on the open
list, email addresses, names, phone numbers. We prevent email address
harvesting for commercial and other spam, and for other questionable
purposes. No one gets spam from being on our list; no one gets annoying
offlist nonsense or harassment from being on our list. OWCP does not get
the information to nail down who you are. Whether you care personally or
not isn't the point; there are other people who do care, and you don't
care what they want, obviously. There's no ban on discussing your
personal situation as it relates to your claim or condition. Two "terrible
things or groups" to keep your personal identifying information from is
OWCP and your agency.
We don't keep archives because everyone's situation is different and
what applies to one may be wrong for another. It's fine with us when
people bring up questions that have been raised before. If it's too much
trouble to ask, then it isn't important enough to ask. Really, it's a lot
easier to just ask the question instead of searching through years of
messages. We have about 800 people here and it would take months for you
to do through an archive.
The reason you haven't seen anything some "OWCP type" might find
interesting, is we prevent that.
You can run your own list any way you want.
paul, webmaster@fedworkerscomp.net
By his signature block, Paul is the Webmaster.. So I have him to thank for that huge link-list. He's also missing a few things I think.. "email address harvesting" is impossible on the "standard" message boards. OWCP can only get whatever anyone chooses to tell on those boards, and it would take "months" to search an archive if everything was in 'dead tree format' and the searching was done by hand. We have computers now. Months of searching is reduced to milliseconds with even the most geriactric personal computers.
Well, he didn't answer any of my questions and went right into defending himself, so I wrote back:
On 12/22/2005 at 7:21 AM K rs wrote:
Wasn't a complaint, Paul.
They were questions. WHich you still didn't answer.
On 12/22/2005 at 2:28 PM K rs wrote:
Paul-
I didn't think you would answer-
I'm just curious as to why all the paranoia.
Not a "demand" or an "attack", just a question. No
need to get all up tight and defensive.
But... Sometimes "They" ARE watching you.. Especially
when you make all kinds of noise about how you're
*not* doing anything that needs watching, but in the
same breath that you've got a secret.
But- Like you said, you get to run your site however
you want. If you want to be the King of Censorship
while "keeping everyone safe" that's fine. Just seems
to stifle the flow of information at times, when I
thought the 'sharing of inforamation & ideas' was the
intent of the whole place. (and I bet it takes up a
bit of your own time...)
Anyway- Try to relax a bit. Not everyone is out to get
you or wants to get into a fight.
Krs
Odd, isn't it, that nobody else in seven years has whined about censorship, just because we don't allow email addresses to be seen by any nut case out there who happens to get on our list. Our 800 list members like the anonymity just fine. Our list policies have nothing to do with me personally or Barb, our listowner. We are retired and do not have an active claim, and we have nothing to gain by putting our time and money into it. If you imagine we have no enemies because of what we're accomplishing, think what you like. You've never run a list on this subject so you have no way of guessing what's needed to keep it on course. Others have tried and failed because they just didn't know what they were doing or lacked the experience and background to deal with the subject or people involved. Why do you make that ridiculous claim that hiding email addresses stifles the flow of information? How does that interfere with sharing information and ideas? Anyone with anything to ask or say about claim handling can put it on the list. What exactly is your problem with that? Not knowing anything about how to handle a list on federal injuries, you wouldn't know there are a lot of people out there in clinical depression and affected other ways by medications and pain, some on the verge of suicide now and then. We will NOT have other people writing them offlist (to their email addresses) giving them advice privately that they're afraid to put on the list instead. There's an enormous amount of misinformation and bad advice out there, and anything said to our list members had better be on the open list where all can see and comment. You are not going to contact our members privately and they're not going to contact you. I've answered your questions in spite of the personal slurs you seem to enjoy so much. You keep up the personal slurs and you will be unsubscribed permanently. Find someone else to nitpick who has time to waste on that crap. paul, webmaster@fedworkerscomp.net So now I'm a whining nutcase.. Who is asking for the emails of the list members so I can.. What, talk them into jumping? And still he refuses to answer the question...
By now I'm pretty much over the whole thing.. I'd get better results talking to a wall.
The last thing I sent was this:
On 12/22/2005 at 9:25 PM K rs wrote:
Did I say ANYWHERE I wanted your email list?
It's really not as bad as you think. But if you think
"all can see and comment" then you really haven't been
paying attention.
Anyway...
Relax!
Sheesh!
Now so far I've been trading comments with Paul who must have forwarded who-knows-what to "Barb", the owner who sent me this:
You know, you really need to learn to play well with others. Sheesh is
right. Apparently you know so little, and act like you know so much. Go
play in the corner and bother somebody who'll put up with you. Maybe
you're in a wheelchair for a reason and you need to learn a little
something about compassion and understanding and selfless effort. Please
don't bother us anymore with your garbage. You're going in the kill file.
Get a life.Go find somewhere else to bitch to-you're not welcome here.
Instead of captain peligro you should call yourself captain Mierta-much
more fitting......
Barb
Knowledge is Power-Use It!
So by now I'm sure everyone's curious to see what it's all about.. Ok. Here's an example of one transmission of this list thing:
Today's Topics: <p> 1. Denial of
Surgery. (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net) 2. Performance of
Duty (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net) 3. Denial of
Surgery. (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net) 4. wrong social
security number (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net) 5. Adaptive vehicle
insurance: (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net) 6.
postal/Withdrawal of (or Failure to Provide) Limited Duty (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net) 7. USPS
Handbooks,Manuals and Publications* (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net) 8. Agency Tactics
(fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net) 9. Re: Performance
of Duty (fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net) --__--__-- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:40:18 -0700 To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Denial of Surgery. Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net This is very nice information to have but one is not borne
with information in ones head concerning the cheating government
and the ways they screw up a claim.
I know how to handle OWCP now but it is
good advice. When i
was injured this list did not exist nor did the
internet. There was no help and people got their life
destroyed. Now there is at lease some help.
Its the system that is screwed-up and
Congress should have stopped the injustice long time ago. such is life and the screwing keeps going and people like
Barb and Paul do what they can. BG --__--__-- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:41:16 -0700 To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Performance of Duty Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net I know a person who has been in voc rehab for two years now and is not terminated from his job yet. He can go back to his job if he get doctor's release for full duty. But he is not sure that he can lift anything over 70 lb for 8 hrs shift. I wonder what happens if he dedices
to go back to work full duty. atCal --- fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net wrote: What I have read is
that Vocation Rehab comes into place after you
have been turned down a
modified job and terminated from the PO. This is not right?
I am awaiting to
recieve my job offer but in the mean time a rehab speciliat has already met and
got my info and is going to set up an
appointment for a psychologist
immediately. I told her it was my understanding
this was not to be done unless the
po wont accommodate and she said Shared Services wanted thius done just in
case and that way they wouldnt have to wait so long
to get me a private sector job. Would any speak about this that has more knowledge than I? I just thought I didnt have to even meet her until I was terminated. Didnt seem to be
right making me go through all this if the po is going to take be back, but I
dont know how to handle it, I can only find a little info about the rehab
program. Thanks for listening. KB --__--__-- Message: 3 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:43:24 -0700 To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Denial of Surgery. Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net Connie, 1. Not a question of work related even SOAF has it in. Lets
stick to the next line only 2. Doctors that OWCP sent me to are not Hand Specialist but
are General Orthopedic. My Doctor that is requesting surgery is
a Hand Specialist Orthopedic. General
Orthopedic do this procedure on a cadaver in Medical School. Hand Specialist Orthopedic do this procedure about once a
week on patients. QUESTION: In matters of the hand does the weight of medical evidence,
that being of a Hand Specialist Orthopedic Surgeon findings
and EXPERIENCE, outweigh the findings of General Orthopedic Surgeons who have no experience in removal of a sesemoid of the thumb? Chilly in Philly --__--__-- Message: 4 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:44:14 -0700 To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] wrong social security number Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net I have a question about my benefits statement from
OWCP. I have noticed that it has come with
an unusual wrong number where my social security number should
be. I called to ask about this from my
claims examiner and was given a
supervisor, who told me they did not know anything about it and that they would
ask about it from somebody in Washington, D.C., and then they hung up on
me. Since then, I have been unable to
find out anything about it. Has anybody on the
list heard of anything like this before?
Do you know who I should call or
write to, to find out about it? Thank
you. JilliQ --__--__-- Message: 5 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:45:11 -0700 To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Adaptive vehicle insurance: Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net I heard a rumor that OWCP will pay the basic insurance on a vehicle they have provided. Is this true or not, and if so is there a form to fill out or how would I get that started? Thanks- Krs --__--__-- Message: 6 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:46:37 -0700 To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] postal/Withdrawal of (or Failure
to Provide) Limited Duty Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net Thank you Sue05 for your knowledge of the rural carrier
craft. I would like you to provide
the provisions. April of 06 I will be with the PO for six years. I only found this site about six months
ago. I took the advice of going to
Dr. Ellis in OK. city. Since , they have everything on track for me. BUT, my CE called to let me know they were
assinging a nurse to me but I
haven't heard from them yet. I am trying
to prepare myself to stay ahead
of the game. any advice would be greatly
appreciated. The last two e-mails
I have sent to fedworkers comp have ended up mixed in with other peoples
e-mails. The last was mixed with SNIP I think, just wanted to let someone
know. I don't know if it was how I wrote
it or how this happened. Thank
all of you for all the information and everyone have a Merry Christmas and
a Happy New Year. JYR fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net wrote: To Barb: I believe you are mistaking RCAs with TRCs. Temporary Rural
Carriers are limited term,
non-bargaining unit rural carriers who have been hired without first passing
the Rural Carrier Exam. Much like city casuals, they are considered
non-career emergency hires and do not enjoy many of the benefits given to
RCAs, such as bidding rights, union representation, leave, etc. This
further establishes the pecking order for the craft. RCAs (Rural Carrier
Associates) are career employees more like city carrier PTFs. As a matter of
fact, several years ago, the USPS and the NRLCA negotiated a new
position within the rural carrier craft called a Part Time Flexible Rural
Carrier. These positions are filled with current senior RCAs. To JYR: Although, contractually speaking, the rights of RCAs vary
from those of Regular Rural
Carriers, the USPS is absolutely just as obligated to RCAs as to other IOD
rural carrier employees. Do not let
anyone with the Postal Service tell you otherwise. Reference pertinent
sections of the MOU at .7 and the National Agreement at Article 7, Sec. B,
& Article 21, Sec. 5. I would be happy to provide the provisions if
requested, as the union will probably not make them available to
non-union employees. Since, throughout my long career, I have found many persons
in authority throughout the USPS
(Injury Comp and management as a whole) to be almost completely ignorant
of the rural carrier craft (city letter carriers and rural carriers are
similar positions with regard to basic work requirements, but
hardly interchangeable- for example: the pay situation for rural carriers is
extremely convoluted) you would be well advised to educate yourself
using reliable sources. Mis-information can be more deadly than no
information. Sue05 --__--__-- Message: 7 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:23:11 -0700 To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] USPS Handbooks,Manuals and
Publications* Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net If it's not in the ASM anymore (it HAS been a few
years,happily!) here's all the other
manuals. I'd appreciate anyone coming back and letting us know. If not there
other ones could be-Employee and Labor Relations Manual,Postal
Operations Manual (POM),EL-312, Employment and Placement ,EL-307, Reasonable
Accommodation....... Barb Knowledge is Power-Use It! http://www.nalc.org/depart/cau/pdf/manuals/asm13.1/asm/asmtoc.pdf Administrative Support Manual (ASM), July 1999, Updated With
Postal Bulletin Revisions
Through July 10, 2003 http://www.nalc.org/depart/cau/manual.html USPS Handbooks,Manuals and Publications* New USPS Handbook - EL-312 The Postal Service issued a new handbook, the EL-312,
Employment and Placement, in
September, 2001. The EL-312 replaces the EL-311, which is now obsolete. Click
to view online or download. NALC contract enforcers know that portions of USPS
handbooks, manuals and other regulations
that "directly relate to wages, hours or working conditions" are
effectively incorporated into the National Agreement through Article 19.
NALC has obtained electronic versions of important USPS manuals and
handbooks directly from Postal Service headquarters. In addition, the Postal
Service has made certain publications available online. *See
cautionary note concerning use of USPS publications. Most of these materials are also available on the Contract
Materials CD Browse or Download: * M-41, M-39 and
Key USPS Handbooks * More USPS
Handbooks * USPS Management
Instructions * USPS Memorandum
of Policy * USPS
Publications USPS Handbooks and Manuals for Browsing or Downloading These materials are in Adobe Acrobat AE format. In Windows
AE, click to browse online,
right-click and save to download. Click and save to download Zip files.
More Information Description of USPS Publication Filename Size Key Handbooks and Manuals Handbook M-41 - City Delivery Carriers Duties and
Responsibilities, March 1998-Updated With
Postal Bulletin Revisions Through April 5, 2001 m41.pdf 1.6MB Handbook M-39 - Management of Delivery Services, March 1998
- Updated With Postal Bulletin
Revisions Through March 18, 2004 M-39.pdf 2.4MB Handbook M-39 - Management of Delivery Services - Complete -
Zip Format m39-3-04.zip 2.1MB Employee and Labor Relations Manual - Issue 17.3, April 2003
elmtoc.pdf 1.2MB Employee and Labor Relations Manual - Issue 17.3, Complete -
Zip Format elm17.3.zip 4.7MB Administrative Support Manual (ASM), July 1999, Updated With
Postal Bulletin Revisions
Through July 10, 2003 asmtoc.pdf 18K Administrative Support Manual (ASM) - Zip Format asm.zip 2.7MB Postal Operations Manual (POM) - Issue 9 - July 2002,
Updated With Postal Bulletin Revisions
Through October 31, 2002 pomtoc.pdf 521K EL-312, Employment and Placement - September 2001 - Updated
With Postal Bulletin Revisions
Through April 17, 2003 el312.pdf 1.2MB More USPS Handbooks AS-353, Guide to Privacy and the Freedom of Information Act
- September 2003 AS-353.pdf 868K AS-504, Space Requirements - July 1999 - Table of Contents as504toc.pdf 201K AS-504, Space Requirements - Zip Format as504.zip 2.9MB DM-103, Official Mail - November 2001 dm103.pdf 6.6MB DM-901, Registered Mail - September 1997 - Updated With
Postal Bulletin Revisions Through
August 10, 2000 dm901.pdf 545K EL-307, Reasonable Accommodation, an Interactive Process -
September 2003 el307.pdf 333K EL-350, Establishing Nonbargaining Requirements - November
1989 el350.pdf 498K EL-502, CSRS Retirement Guide - July 1999 el502.pdf 270K EL-505, Injury Compensation - December 1995, Updated by
Postal Bulletin Revisions Through May
8, 1997 505url.pdf 2.1MB EL-505, Injury Compensation - Zip Format el505.zip 9.1MB EL-603, Equal Employment Opportunity Complaint Processing -
July 1996 el603.pdf 580K EL-801, Supervisor's Safety Handbook - May 2001 el801.pdf 420K EL-802, Executive's and Manager's Safety Compliance Guide -
April 2002 el802.pdf 734K EL-809, Guidelines for Area/Local Joint Labor-Management
Safety and Health Committees - April
2001 el809.pdf 46K EL-809T, Area/Local Joint Labor-Management Safety and Health
Committee Training - April 2001
el809t.pdf 127K EL-812, Hazardous Materials and Spill Response - May 1998 el812.pdf 1.3MB EL-814, Employee's Guide to Safety - March 2001 el814.pdf 161K F-1, Post Office Accounting Procedures - November 1996,
Updated by Postal Bulletin Revisions
through September 4, 2003 f1toc.pdf 306K F-1, Post Office Accounting Procedures - Zip Format f1.zip 4.7MB F-15, Travel and Relocation - August 1997 - Updated With
Postal Bulletin Revisions Through
January 9, 2003 f15.pdf 953K F-21, Time and Attendance - June 2002 f21toc.pdf 311K F-21, Time and Attendance - June 2002 - Zip Format F-21.zip 24.2MB F-401, Supervisor's Guide to Scheduling and Premium Pay -
August 2000 f401.pdf 334K M-32, Management Operating Data System (MODS) - April 2000 m32.pdf 1.2MB P-5, Highway Contract Routes - Box Delivery Service - July
2001 p5.pdf 195K PO-610, Signature Capture and Electronic Record Management:
Manager's Guide to Standard Operating
Procedures - July 2000 po610.pdf 718K PO-701, Fleet Management - March 1991- Updated With Postal
Bulletin Revisions Through
September 21, 2000 po701.pdf 3.8MB USPS Management Instructions MI AS-310-96-3, Management of Policy and Procedure
Information - Paper and On-Line - May 1, 1996
MI AS-310-96-3.pdf 144K MI EL-430-90-8, Back Pay - July 2, 1990 MI EL-430-90-8.pdf 126K MI EL-510-1999-4, Annual Leave Sharing Program - October 27,
1999 MI EL-510-1999-4.pdf 50K MI EL-520-91-2, FEHB: Temporary Continuation of Coverage -
March 27, 1991 MI EL-520-91-2.pdf 132K MI EL-540-91-1, Job-Related First Aid Injuries - January 25,
1991 MI EL-540-91-1.pdf 37K MI EL-810-96-1, Response to Hazardous Materials Releases - February
1, 1996 MI EL-810-96-1.pdf 70K MI EL-810-96-2, Hazard Communication Programs - Feburary 2,
1996 MI EL-810-96-2.pdf 70K MI EL-860-98-2, Employee Medical Records - May 15, 1998 MI EL-860-98-2.pdf 86K MI EL-860-1999-3, Emergency Response to Mail Allegedly
Containing Anthrax - October 4, 1999 MI EL-860-1999-3.pdf 26K MI EL-860-2000-7, Fitness for Duty Examinations - September
28, 2000 MI EL-860-2000-7.pdf 132K MI FM-640-2002-1, Government-Issued, Individually Billed
Travel Charge Cards - March 4, 2002
MI FM-640-2002-1.pdf 32K MI PO-720-95-2, Alcohol and Drug Testing of Employees With a
Commercial Driver's License -
September 29, 1995 MI PO-720-95-2.pdf 82K USPS Memorandum of Policy COO-10-25-2001, Collection of Employee Data - October 25,
2001 COO-10-25-2001.pdf 16K USPS Publications PUB 18, Manager's Guide to Understanding Affirmative Action
- June 1996 pub18.pdf 255K PUB 32, Glossary of Postal Terms - May 1997 - Updated With
Postal Bulletin Revisions Through
November 4, 1999 pub32.pdf 556K PUB 45, A Violence-Free Workplace - November 1998 pub45.pdf 65K PUB 60, A Great Place to Work - February 1999 pub60.pdf 295K PUB 60-B, A Great Place to Work for City Carriers - October
1999 pub60b.pdf 305K PUB 71, Notice for Employees Requesting FMLA Leave -
February 2001 pub71.pdf 24K PUB 107, Crisis Management for Violent Incidents - May 1997 pub107.pdf 118K PUB 108, Threat Assessment Team Guide - May 1997 pub108.pdf 163K PUB 164, Compensation, Relocation Benefits, and
Reinstatement Policies for Career Employees -
January 2003 pub164.pdf 135K PUB 223, Directives and Forms Catalog - June 1999, Updated
With Postal Bulletin Revisions
Through September 18, 2003 pub223-2003.pdf 1.5MB PUB-317, Manager's Guide to Reasonable Accommodation - July
2002 pub317.pdf 346K PUB 518, EAP Supervisor's Guide - December 1993 pub518.pdf 486K PUB 519, Employee Assistance Program - October 1993 pub519.pdf 321K PUB 542, Understanding The Private Express Statutes - June
1998 pub542.pdf 147K PUB 552, Manager 92s Guide to Understanding Sexual Harassment
- September 2001 pub552.pdf 421K PUB 553, Employee 92s Guide to Understanding Sexual
Harassment - September 2001 pub553.pdf 422K June 1997 Three Cautions on the Use of USPS Publications 1. Check for the latest issue. The Postal Service updates
its various manuals and handbooks
according to different schedules. (For instance, the ELM has been revised
several times during the past couple of years.) To see if you have the
current edition of a particular publication, obtain the latest
Publication 223, Directives and Forms Catalog, from the USPS Web site,
http://www.usps.com. Use the site 92s search function to locate a publication. 2. Some provisions may be under NALC challenge. Any of the
USPS handbooks, manuals or
publications provided on this site or available on the Web may be under an NALC
challenge in the grievance procedure. NALC 92s distribution of or
links to these materials is not in any way an admission that they are
contractually sound or otherwise free from challenge. Check with your NALC branch
officers or national business agent about the validity of a
particular publication or provision. 3. Some items may not be covered by Article 19. Some handbook
and manual provisions 97for
example, much of the M-39, M-41 and ELM 97are enforce-able as part
of the contract under Article 19. However, certain other USPS
publications may not be covered by Article 19. USPS Publications Available Online The Employee and Labor Relations Manual (ELM), the Domestic
Mail Manual (DMM), International
Mail Manual (IMM), Publication 223, Directives and Forms Catalog, and
issues of the Postal Bulletin are all available online at the Postal
Service's Web site, http://www.usps.com. Use the site's search engine to find
these publications. --__--__-- Message: 8 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:01:59 -0700 To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Agency Tactics Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net I am wondering if anyone else has experienced the same. This year as has been true for the
past 4 years, my Christmas greetings from the post office came in the form
of a certified letter. I am not sure
what it contains as the
letter carrier did not even bother to knock the door, he just left the notice
in my mailbox. Maybe, he is aware of the
contents and did not want to
be a willing party to this. In the past,
the contents have been
"option letters" threatening removal.
Who knows, this year, it may even be the
removal that they have been "promising." Hope no one else got this type of
greeting. I wonder why agencies feel
that they have to resort to
psychological warfare when the cards are all stacked in their favor anyway. Thanks for letting me get this off my chest. dps --__--__-- Message: 9 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:14:56 -0700 To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net From: fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net Subject: [Fedworkerscomp] Re: Performance of Duty Reply-To: fedworkerscomp@fedworkerscomp.net Rehab has nothing to do with turning down a modified job or
any other job, nor is it automatic
under certain circumstances. The program is described in the CA-810 and
other sources. The way I read it, it's
not triggered so long as the claimant
is still carried as an employee where injured. You're notified of your obligations under the OWCP rehab
program by a formal letter from
OWCP. If you are not so notified by letter from OWCP, then any other
so-called Rehab is not required by OWCP and you are under no obligation
whatever to pay any attention to it. It
sounds to me like you're being set up
for total disaster. If that's the case I suggest you go to the
psychologist appointment and tell him to shove it. paul, webmaster@fedworkerscomp.net *********** REPLY SEPARATOR
*********** On 12/21/2005 at 8:41 PM WebmasterFWC wrote: I know a person who
has been in voc rehab for two years now and is not
terminated from his job yet. He can go back to his
job if he get doctor's release for full duty. But he is
not sure that he can lift anything over 70 lb
for 8 hrs shift. I wonder what happens if he dedices to go back to work full duty. atCal ---
fedworkerscomp-admin@fedworkerscomp.net wrote: What I have read is
that Vocation Rehab comes into place after you
have been turned down a
modified job and terminated from the PO. This is
not right? I am awaiting to
recieve my job offer but in the mean time a rehab speciliat has already met and
got my info and is going to set up an
appointment for a psychologist
immediately. I told her it was my understanding
this was not to be done unless the
po wont accommodate and she said Shared
Services wanted thius done just in
case and that way they wouldnt have to wait so
long to get me a private sector job. Would any speak about this that has more knowledge than I? I just thought I didnt have to even meet her until I
was terminated. Didnt seem to be
right making me go through all this if the po is going to take be back, but I
dont know how to handle it, I can only find a little info about the rehab
program. Thanks for listening. KB
It even contained a question of mine.. But see how much Crap had to be shoveled just for that? So not worth it.. Almost need a search function on the email itself to find what you're looking for. In fact, I've used 'CTRL-F' to get to what I wanted to read several times. So no wonder Paul isn't interested in building an archive. Can you imagine the mess that would be if the information was left in this format?
The thing I find really strange about it is you only get 1 part of the conversation per email. So unless you happen to remember what was in yesterday's mail, that is IF there was a part of it there yesterday.. Could be the day before, or the day before that.... Often it's hard if not impossible to figure out what's going on.
More evidence of paranoia- When I did a Whois search on fedworkerscomp.org I hit the wall newly implimented (in the last year or 2) by InterNic where with a few extra $$ a person can hide the regristration information for a domain name. So I went back in time a bit & looked up 'fedupfeds.org' their former domain name.. Here's what I found:
Domain ID:D88098465-LROR
Domain Name:FEDUPFEDS.ORG
Created On:03-Jul-2002 17:38:10 UTC
Last Updated On:12-Aug-2005 17:40:57 UTC
Expiration Date:03-Jul-2006 17:43:38 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Moniker Online Services Inc. (R145-LROR)
Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:MONIKER23658
Registrant Name:Role
Registrant Organization:Moniker Privacy Services
Registrant Street1:20 SW 27 Ave
Registrant Street2:Suite 201
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Pompano Beach
Registrant State/Province:FL
Registrant Postal Code:33069
Interesting huh? "Moniker Privacy Services" registered the domain name for them. So... The question STILL remains even after ALL this.. What are these people afraid of?
Maybe there just isn't an answer.. If you ask the guy in the basement bunker in Montana why he has an armory full of guns & 500 years of MRE's he'll tell you "The Government is out to Get Me."
Seems like the same thing is going on with this crowd. Not only do they really seem to enjoy keeping secrets and "protecting" their flock.. They seem to enjoy the power of censorship over that flock just as much. They claim to have "800 members".. I wonder how many of these "800 members" (quite a following for being around seven years huh?) are still active? I bet only 10 to 20%.
I'm sure in the beginning the intent was to actually help one another.. But now.. I'm not really sure what's going on. I know it's not worth my time to try & ferret out an answer here.. Better to just call the OWCP office & ask. So getting banned was probably a good thing.. Now I don't waste time reading it out of morbid curiosity, and I don't have to go through the dance of trying to remove myself from the list. Should I ever want to join again (Why I would I haven't the faintest, but..) all I have to do is get an email addy somewhere & sign up. Very easy. Sign my questions "Bob" and nobody's the wiser. And even if "They" have my IP squirreled away somewhere it's not like that's difficult to mask...
Anyone remember what's said about "Absolute Power"? A perfect example can be found right here. "We're not about getting mad or getting even... " They say.